INFECTED BLOOD INQUIRY – NEWS 2020
The Infected Blood Inquiry
The Inquiry will examine why men, women and children in the UK were given infected blood and/or infected blood products; the impact on their families; how the authorities (including government) responded; the nature of any support provided following infection; questions of consent; and whether there was a cover-up.
Inquiry News & Updates
September 2020
Inquiry publishes supplementary report by Psychosocial Group
Today the Infected Blood Inquiry has published a supplementary report answering further questions asked of the psychosocial expert group.
The supplementary report examines a number of aspects of the psychosocial impact of infection with HIV, hepatitis C including:
- parents or carers making decisions about, or administering, blood products
- fear of infecting other family members, and the fear of being infected by a family member
- living with a predicted shorter lifespan
- dependence on welfare benefits
- awareness of deaths across the community of people infected
- campaigning over many years
- decisions about having children
- failure of treatment for infections
- notification of possible exposure to vCJD
- being subject to clinical trials, and
- effects on the wider family including subsequent generations.
At the end of expert hearings in February 2020, Inquiry Chair Sir Brian Langstaff asked the group for their views on how to minimise harm in the case of healthcare error, and how best to reduce the continuing stigma experienced by people infected with HIV and/or Hepatitis C in healthcare settings.
The Inquiry published its first expert report on psychosocial issues in February 2020.
Any questions about the work of the experts should be directed to the Inquiry through contact@infectedbloodinquiry.org.uk, or by calling 0808 169 1377.
Week Four: Haemophilia Clinicians Public Hearings Open For Registration
Registration has now opened for the fourth week (Tuesday 20 – Thursday 22 October) of the Inquiry’s Haemophilia Clinicians hearings. During that week, the Inquiry will be hearing evidence in person from Dr Christine Lee and Professor Edward Tuddenham.
We are asking people to register before Friday 25 September so that we can confirm seats. It would help the team if you could only register for dates that you know you would be free to attend. If you have any difficulties registering, the team will be able to help you. Registration for later hearings will be announced on the Inquiry website, and by email to everyone on our mailing list. You can join the Inquiry’s mailing list by emailing contact@infectedbloodinquiry.org.uk or calling 0808 169 1377.
Anyone with a confirmed place to attend hearings will find information about the practical details in this factsheet, such as wearing face coverings, allocated seating in the hearing room and lounges, and maintaining 2m distance from other attendees outside your own household. The Inquiry will continue to provide psychological support, refreshments, and first aid at the hearings and will meet reasonable expenses.
We have also extended the hours for telephone support while the hearings are ongoing. Confidential psychological support will be available from 12 until 6pm on any day when a hearing is taking place and can be accessed on 0800 458 9473 and 0203 417 0280. If you prefer to call at another time, you can leave a message and the team will call you back.
August 2020
Registration opens for first three weeks of hearings
Inquiry provides update on witnesses for later hearing sessions
The Inquiry is today opening registration for the first three weeks of hearings this autumn.
The witnesses and presentations will relate to haemophilia centres, apart from the first witness who will be Lord David Owen on Tuesday 22 September.
These hearings are being held against the backdrop of the pandemic. In the June consultation on future hearings, a common theme among respondents was that the Inquiry should facilitate the participation of the public, media and legal representatives to the greatest extent possible consistent with safety.
The Inquiry team has carried out a thorough risk assessment and is confident that the risk of transmission of the coronavirus while attending a hearing is reduced, due to measures including reserved seating at 2m distance, the wearing of face coverings and thorough cleaning every evening. The full risk assessment is available here. The Inquiry will continue to provide psychological support, refreshments, and first aid at the hearings and will meet expenses incurred.
To facilitate the full participation of everyone watching proceedings remotely, there will be a live broadcast of the hearing sessions available for people who sign up to receive this closer to the time, in addition to the YouTube broadcast with a short time delay. The telephone support offered by the Inquiry’s British Red Cross team will operate throughout the hearings.
We are asking anyone who is considering whether to attend in person to think carefully about the risks and benefits before registering. Due to social distancing measures, the number of Inquiry participants, recognised legal representatives, and media who can attend will be significantly lower than in previous hearings.
You can register to attend the first three weeks’ hearing sessions here. We are asking people to do this by Friday 4 September where possible so that we can confirm seats.
The detailed timetable for subsequent weeks is not available yet because obtaining finalised witness statements has been made more complex a process than it would otherwise have been due to the pandemic.
However, we have updated the indicative timetable to give you the best idea we can of some of the witnesses and presentations we hope to hear, and when. You can read it here. We will provide further updates on our website as soon as more information is available.
As soon as witness statements are available in their final form, they will be disclosed to core participants to enable them and their legal representatives to prepare for the hearings. As has been the case with previous witnesses, their statements will be published on the website when each gives evidence, so that those who are not core participants may read them.
Chair of the Inquiry, Sir Brian Langstaff, said:
“Covid-19 has cast its shadow over almost everything for the past six months. It threatened to delay the progress of the Inquiry. I was determined the Inquiry should press on, working every bit as hard, and should lose as little time as possible. But it was important to take your views about the hearings into account. So the Inquiry consulted you on how best to proceed. You not only agreed with this approach, but added some useful suggestions. Thank you.
These hearings will undoubtedly feel different. Many of you will prefer to participate online. Those of you who in normal times would have wanted to be in the hearing room may hesitate or feel unable to come. Whatever you choose, I hope you will continue to feel involved.
The virus makes it more difficult to plan with certainty. Though we hope to publish more detail about the hearings soon, it is to be expected that the pandemic will mean changes at short notice.
Everyone involved – Inquiry participants, witnesses, and legal representatives – has been understanding, and patient. More understanding and patience is likely to be needed: may I thank you for it, in anticipation. Together we shall continue to make progress.”
Inquiry publishes additional material for HIV and Hepatitis expert reports
Today the Infected Blood Inquiry has published additional material answering further questions for the HIV and hepatitis expert groups.
The reports were first published ahead of expert hearings which took place from the 24-28 February.
Hepatitis
The addition to the hepatitis report addresses two further questions posed in the supplemental letters of instruction to the hepatitis expert group on the 20 March 2020. The questions arose following the expert evidence given to the Inquiry in February and relate to genotypes among those infected with hepatitis C, and when it became known that hepatitis B was sexually transmissible.
HIV
The addition to the HIV report addresses questions posed to the HIV expert group in the original letter of instruction issued on 25 September 2019, and the supplemental letter of instruction on 20 December 2019. These relate to issues around HIV transmission, care and medical training.
You can find the additional material at the end of each report here:
Hepatitis expert report with additional material
HIV expert report with additional material
Any questions about the work of the experts should be directed to the Inquiry through contact@infectedbloodinquiry.org.uk
You can find out more information about the experts and the letters of instruction here.
July 2020
Newsletter
The most recent edition of the Infected Blood Inquiry newsletter has now been published and you can view this in the link provided below.
We are now able to send out copies of the newsletter by post and they should be received soon.
If you would like to access past newsletters issued by the Inquiry, they can be found here.
Documents
Views shared in consultation to shape next phase of hearings
Inquiry publishes indicative weeks for hearings and information for witnesses
We are grateful to everyone who responded to Sir Brian’s letter to core participants seeking views on the Inquiry’s proposed approach to the autumn hearings. We received a wide range of responses from people participating in the Inquiry including individual participants, recognised legal representatives, institutional core participants and people who took part in the Inquiry’s recent local meetings.
There were some common themes raised across all groups:
- the importance of these hearings for witnesses and individual participants
- agreement that the Inquiry should proceed with hearings, subject to public health considerations, rather than risk delay to its progress
- with physical attendance very likely to be limited, suggestions for enhancements to the livestream service
- psychological support to continue to be provided
- a desire that participation of the public, media and legal representatives should be facilitated to the greatest extent possible consistent with safety to health.
A number of people made practical suggestions designed to keep everyone participating safe and connected, which we will use in our planning.
We have today (Thursday 9 July) published updated information for witnesses and an updated statement of approach about the Inquiry’s approach to the questioning of witnesses. The Inquiry’s aim is that each witness is enabled to give the best evidence they can.
Wherever possible, the Chair would like witnesses to give evidence in person. The Inquiry recognises, however, that due to public health measures for coronavirus and/or because of existing health conditions, some witnesses are likely to give evidence over live video link.
There will be some space for the public and media to attend hearings, with maximum numbers determined by government guidance and public health considerations at the time. The Inquiry team will carry out and share a full risk assessment before hearings start, and will test IT for those giving evidence over live video link.
During the consultation, Scottish participants suggested holding hearings involving Scottish witnesses in Scotland to minimise travel, and the Inquiry is looking at the feasibility of this.
We can now also confirm the following indicative weeks in autumn 2020 and spring 2021 during which we intend to hold hearings. Hearings are expected to start on Tuesday 22 September. The timetable is provisional and subject to change.
Indicative weeks for hearings with haemophilia clinicians:
- week of 22 September
- week of 28 September
- week of 5 October
- week of 19 October
- week of 26 October
- week of 2 November
- week of 16 November
- week of 30 November
- week of 7 December
- week of 14 December
- week of 11 January
- week of 18 January
The Inquiry also intends to hear from the medical ethics experts during these hearings.
Indicative weeks for hearings on the Haemophilia Society
- week of 1 February
- week of 8 February
Indicative weeks for hearings on the Trusts and Schemes
- week of 22 February
- week of 1 March
- week of 8 March
Indicative week for hearings on Treloar’s
- week of 22 March
We will publish the full timetable and open registration in due course.
Chair of the Inquiry, Sir Brian Langstaff, said:
“The safety of all those participating in the Inquiry’s hearings is a priority. The pandemic imposed unusual restraints on all of us, and led inevitably to changes in the way the Inquiry has to go about its task. The contributions to our consultation have been encouraging, thoughtful and constructive, and shown the value of collecting different perspectives on how best to adapt to the challenges. Everyone who contributed really deserves my thanks – and has them.
“Consultees emphasised how important it is that the Inquiry continues to make progress. The first part of that progress will come in the autumn from clinicians working primarily in the 1970s and 1980s. I look forward to pressing on with the hearings.”
June 2020
Further nominees for psychosocial expert group put forward
Two fertility experts nominated to join the psychosocial expert group
Two further experts have been put forward to join the Infected Blood Inquiry’s psychosocial group to provide expertise on fertility for the group’s supplementary report.
The nominees will provide independent expertise to inform the Inquiry’s understanding of the psychosocial impact on those infected and affected.
The nominees to the psychosocial group can be found here.
Consultation on autumn hearings
Inquiry seeks views about resuming hearings
Sir Brian Langstaff, Chair of the Infected Blood Inquiry, has written to all core participants outlining the Inquiry’s approach to holding safe hearings during the coronavirus pandemic.
The Inquiry postponed hearings in June and July this year to hear evidence from clinicians and others who could shed light on the policies and practices of haemophilia centres across the UK. Subject to the course of the pandemic and government guidance, the Inquiry is now working towards holding those hearings at Fleetbank House this autumn.
In his letter, Sir Brian says:
“It goes without saying that any hearings we hold in line with the guidance to protect us all from coronavirus will feel very different. But waiting for the public health context to change would result in considerable delay which I cannot justify in light of the length of time many have already waited for the answers this Inquiry is tasked to deliver.”
Sir Brian asks core participants to share their views by Wednesday 24 June.
You can read Sir Brian’s letter here.
Local meetings with the Inquiry Team
Opportunity to hear updates on the Inquiry’s work.
Although it is not possible for us to meet in person, we want to continue with the local meetings we have held for people infected and affected across the UK. This will be a learning experience for us all, and we plan to start by making these meetings local to help you maintain connections made at previous meetings, as well as hear about the Inquiry’s work.
That is why we are asking you to register for the location nearest to your home. We will be using a system for these meetings which allows you to join either through video by using your tablet, laptop or smartphone, or if it suits you better, to join from your landline phone.
As this is new for us, we are starting small with 15 registrations (one for a household) because this should allow everyone taking part to ask questions. We expect to learn from experience and anticipate that we may need to add in extra meetings or increase the number of registrations as we go along.
Locations and Dates:
Locations and Dates |
|
Newcastle – Tuesday 9 June | Birmingham – Wednesday 17 June |
Carlisle – Wednesday 10 June | Lincoln – Wednesday 17 June |
Swansea – Wednesday 10 June | Norwich – Wednesday 17 June |
Glasgow – Thursday 11 June | London / Home counties – Wednesday 24 June |
Perth – Thursday 11 June | Bangor (Wales) – Monday 29 June |
Inverness – Monday 15 June | Liverpool – Monday 29 June |
Cardiff – Monday 15 June | Bournemouth – Monday 29 June |
Plymouth – Monday 15 June | Leeds – Wednesday 1 July |
Belfast – Tuesday 16 June | Manchester – Wednesday 1 July |
Derry – Tuesday 16 June | London / Home counties – Wednesday 1 July |
Bristol – Tuesday 16 June | London / Home counties – Friday 3 July |
You can register your interest in attending by completing a response form or contact us for more details.
Once you have registered, the Inquiry team will be in touch with detailed instructions on how to join the meeting.
Sir Brian Langstaff calls on new sponsor Minister to cut through problems with psychological and financial support
Letter from Chair of the Inquiry welcomes sponsor Minister’s commitment to address issues of pressing concern to participants in the Inquiry.
The Chair of the Infected Blood Inquiry, Sir Brian Langstaff, has replied to the Paymaster General’s confirmation of her appointment as sponsor Minister.
Noting that the Inquiry is a priority for the Government and for the Minister personally, Sir Brian welcomed her commitment to act on issues of pressing concern to participants in the Inquiry. He says that it remains the case that the majority of people infected and affected do not have access to dedicated psychological support and that financial hardships continue.
In his letter Sir Brian says:
“It is not easy to expose intimate details of one’s life to public gaze. I have asked [people infected and affected] to take all the risks of doing so, in the interests of the Inquiry. You will understand then why it is that I feel a particular sense of responsibility for ensuring that the support is there for them, on a professional and long term basis, not only to assist in dealing with the problems of the past but with the added pressures that participating in the Inquiry will have brought to bear on them. I hope that with ministerial colleagues in the four nations you are able to cut through whatever problems have prevented greater progress to date.”
You can read the letters below.
May 2020
Judicial review process complete
Newsletter
Over the next few months, the Inquiry will provide more regular updates on its ongoing work.
The most recent edition of the Infected Blood Inquiry newsletter has now been published and you can view this in the link provided below.
Unfortunately due to all staff currently working from home, we are unable to send physical copies of this newsletter in the post.
If you would like to access past newsletters issued by the Inquiry, they can be found here.
Documents
April 2020
Inquiry publishes finance report
Report details Inquiry spending breakdown
We have today (Thursday 30th April) published our latest financial report which details the Inquiry’s annual expenditure for the 2019-20 financial year, up to 31 March 2020.
The report details that the Inquiry spent £25.987millon in 2019-20, up from £9.308million in 2018-19 and bringing total spending to date to £35.295million. This increase in costs reflects the Inquiry beginning its full hearings in April 2019, along with significant escalation of the Inquiry’s investigative work and a significant increase in legal costs.
The Inquiry’s investigation was the biggest item of expenditure at £8.85million, up from £2.18million in 2018-19. As of 31 March 2020, 277 solicitors, investigators and paralegals were reviewing millions of historical documents over multiple decades, making the Infected Blood Inquiry the largest public inquiry investigation of its kind.
The second biggest item of expenditure was legal fees paid to representatives of core participants funded through the Inquiry at £5.74million, up from £2.52million in 2018-19.
The third biggest item of expenditure was the cost of the Inquiry’s public hearings at £4.29million, up from £0.98million in 2018-19. In 2019-20 the Inquiry held hearings in Edinburgh, Cardiff, Belfast and Leeds, as well as a significant number of witness and expert hearings at the Inquiry hearing room in London.
The full report can be found here.
Inquiry publishes individual written statements
More evidence is provided by people infected and affected
Over eleven weeks of hearings last year, the Inquiry heard oral evidence from people who have been infected and affected by treatment with infected blood or blood products. The written statements made by that group of witnesses are all now available on the Inquiry’s website.
In total, the Inquiry expects to receive more than 3,500 individual written statements. These statements will be disclosed to core participants, then published on the Inquiry’s website, and will inform the Inquiry Chair’s report. The first set of these written statements – from those who did not give oral evidence last year – are also now available on the Inquiry’s website.
The first set of statements can be found here.
Preparing statements for publication takes some time as they have to be carefully checked, so the Inquiry plans to do this in sets of around 200 at a time. Individuals who provided a statement will be informed before their statement is made public.
Sir Brian Langstaff, Chair of the Inquiry, said:
“Making a written statement to the Inquiry, knowing that it will be published, is never likely to be easy. It may be emotional; bring back troubling memories; cause anger that life turned out in a way it should not have done; or worry those who have spent a lifetime hiding illness.
“Having the courage to do this deserves recognition: I am reading each and every statement and the Inquiry is publishing each and every statement. And when others read these powerful statements, I trust it will open their eyes as it has mine.”
Anyone who wishes to make a written statement is still welcome to do so. More information about providing a statement or speaking confidentially to the Inquiry’s team of intermediaries can be found here.
Inquiry files paperwork in judicial review
Court asked to review decision-making process
A core participant client of Collins Solicitors has issued judicial review proceedings against a procedural decision of the Chair of the Inquiry, Sir Brian Langstaff, choosing one of the two courses open to him in law by which a dispute over the assessment of a monthly costs award can be resolved. We filed paperwork today (22 April 2020) in the Administrative Court outlining why we do not accept this challenge.
Judicial review is a type of court proceeding in which a judge reviews the lawfulness of a decision or action made by a public body, or the way it was made. The first step in judicial review proceedings is a process which assesses whether claims have any reasonable prospect of success: it is only if a judge grants permission that a claim can then go further. The core participant is currently seeking such permission.
Medical Ethics expert report published
Leading experts provide insight into best practice in their field
We have today (Tuesday 7th April) published the report of the Inquiry’s Expert Group on Medical Ethics.
The 130-page report discusses the ethical principles that should govern and inform clinical decision-making. It was commissioned primarily to inform the Inquiry’s questioning of clinicians in future hearings.
The report is based on letters of instruction given to the Group by the Inquiry which had input from core participants. Many of the questions and responses relate to general medical ethics and are not necessarily specific to issues of infected blood and blood products, hepatitis, HIV or blood and bleeding disorders.
The Expert Group has chosen to structure its report in six sections to cover all the questions in the letters of instructions.
The six sections are:
1. General and introductory questions
2. Questions relating to the treatment of patients
3. Questions on testing for infection
4. Questions on informing people of infections
5. Questions on the ethics of research
6. Other questions put by the Inquiry not captured above
The Inquiry Chair, Sir Brian Langstaff, appointed experts across a range of specialisms last year, as leaders in their various fields, to provide independent expertise to the Inquiry in a way that is clear and transparent. The experts were asked to explain in their reports what is now known and considered as best practice and how that has come about, and not to give an opinion on what a clinician at a previous time either knew or did, or ought to have known and done. It is for the Inquiry Chair to determine what happened and why with infected blood and blood products, and the expert reports help to inform the Inquiry’s work.
Participants are invited to consider the report in their own time ahead of the Inquiry’s hearings with clinicians (currently set to resume in September 2020) and to provide any feedback they may have to their legal representatives or, if unrepresented, to the Inquiry.
The report can be read here.
More details about the Inquiry’s Expert Groups, including their membership, the letters of instruction and previous reports published by other groups, can be found here.
Newsletter
The most recent edition of the Infected Blood Inquiry newsletter has now been published. This is designed to provide a short update on the work of the Inquiry.
You can view the newsletter below.
Unfortunately due to all staff currently working from home, we are unable to send physical copies of this newsletter in the post.
If you would like to access past newsletters issued by the Inquiry, they can be found here.
Documents
March 2020
Further instruction letters for expert groups published
Letters detail additional questions raised during hearings
We have today (Friday 20 March) published two further Supplemental Letters of Instruction, one to each of the hepatitis and psychosocial expert groups. These Letters contain additional questions raised during the expert hearings in February. The questions will be answered in a further report from the hepatitis group and in the supplemental report being prepared by the psychosocial group.
You can read the letters below.
Inquiry files paperwork in judicial review
Court asked to review decision-making process
A client of Collins Solicitors has issued judicial review proceedings against a decision of the Chair of the Inquiry, Sir Brian Langstaff. We filed paperwork yesterday (18 March 2020) to the Administrative Court outlining why we do not believe this challenge is valid.
Judicial review is a type of court proceeding in which a judge reviews the lawfulness of a decision or action made by a public body. It is a challenge to the way in which a decision has been made, rather than the rights and wrongs of the conclusion reached.
The core participant is currently seeking permission for the court to review a funding decision made by the Chair of the Inquiry.
Change to dates for next hearings
Dates for next Inquiry hearings postponed due to Coronavirus
We previously announced that the next Inquiry hearings would be in June and July 2020 when we would hear evidence from clinicians and others who can shed light on the policies and practices of haemophilia centres across the UK.
Circumstances have now changed. The risks of coronavirus to people who are older or who have health conditions mean it is no longer practical or safe to continue with our planned hearings. We will therefore no longer be holding hearings in June and July 2020.
We are now planning on the basis that hearings will resume in mid-September 2020 and onwards. However, we will not be able to confirm the dates and open registration until the course of the virus is clearer.
Chair of the Inquiry, Sir Brian Langstaff, said:
“The wellbeing of participants in the Inquiry is my predominant concern. This is emphatically so given the illnesses they have already suffered, and their continuing after-effects. It is also important that wherever and whenever possible we allow the public and participants access in person to our hearings. I have therefore taken the decision to postpone the next hearings to a safer time.”
“It is important to stress this decision will not put the Inquiry on pause. As far as we can, my team and I continue to work full tilt on the investigation and preparation for future hearings. We remain determined to proceed to a conclusion as quickly as possible. However, this is an unprecedented situation and the safety of those involved, both as participants and as witnesses, must be the priority.”
Sir Brian Langstaff calls for specialist psychological support across the UK
Chair of the Inquiry urged authorities to act quickly for those infected and affected
Sir Brian Langstaff has repeated his call for specialist psychological support to be made available for people infected and affected by the use of infected blood and blood products. The Infected Blood Inquiry Chair said the testimony of experts and intermediaries had added to the weight of evidence already provided by people infected and affected that provision of specialist psychological support remains lacking and urgently needed.
In his closing remarks reflecting on a week of hearings with expert witnesses on psychosocial impact, hepatitis, HIV and bleeding and blood disorders, Sir Brian said that this evidence underlined the call he made last year:
“We shall all take our own messages from this week of evidence, but what I personally would like to highlight is this: it must be the case that anyone who has given a life threatening diagnosis may need support and should be offered it, and so too their families may need support …
“Every day this week we have heard the same message: that support is needed. Not just from those to whom the intermediaries gave voice. We haven’t heard it just from the psychosocial experts, but we’ve heard it also from leading experts in hepatitis and leading experts in HIV, and today we’ve heard that psychological support remains at best patchy in some parts of the country.”
Sir Brian informed participants that the Inquiry had now received written responses from the relevant authorities in England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales on the level of support now being offered in each nation. But he made clear that more progress needs to be made, particularly in England and Scotland, and that this does not need to wait for the outcome of his Inquiry:
“Both Northern Ireland and Wales have told us that they’ve started to answer this call by providing services bespoke to those who have been infected by blood and blood products. If they have opened the door to treatment and support, I would hope – indeed expect – to see England and Scotland fully follow suit.
“Though I’ve had no detailed dissection of any figures as yet, the evidence thus far suggests that the outlay of public funds would not be great but also that expenditure on support and screening will save money in the long run because it will help improve and maintain health …
“I hope to be able to acknowledge in the final [Inquiry] report that proper support and follow-up will by then be in place across the UK.”
A video of Sir Brian’s closing statement to the week of expert hearings is available on the Inquiry’s YouTube channel here.
A transcript of Friday 28 February’s hearing (including Counsel to the Inquiry’s summary of the responses received from the relevant authorities in England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales – beginning on page 153) is available on the Inquiry’s website here.
The full responses from the relevant authorities in England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales are also available on the Evidence section of the Inquiry’s website here.
February 2020
Newsletter
The most recent edition of the Infected Blood Inquiry newsletter has now been published. This is designed to provide a short update on the work of the Inquiry.
You can view the newsletter below.
If you would like to access past newsletters issued by the Inquiry, they can be found here.
Documents
Timetable and factsheet for expert hearings
We have published the timetable and factsheet to provide information for those attending the hearings in London on 24-28 February.
January 2020
Intermediaries’ report published
Report to help inform Inquiry findings
We have today (29 January 2019) published the report written by the Inquiry’s intermediaries.
Some people told the Inquiry that the stigma attached to their experiences meant they would have difficulty in providing witness statements or oral testimony in the traditional way associated with public inquiries.
Last year the Inquiry recruited three trained professionals to act as intermediaries. They visited individuals and families who requested their support and have now submitted their first report to the Inquiry. The report covers a number of people’s experiences, without revealing their identities. The intermediaries continue to be available for people who would like to contribute to the Inquiry by speaking to them rather than by giving a witness statement.
The report will help inform the Inquiry’s work and on 24 February the three intermediaries will be questioned at the start of the week of expert hearings in February.
You can read the report here.
You can find out more information about the intermediaries, including how to speak to them here.